![]() Gibbs may have failed to decipher the Voynich manuscript, but he joins a long and illustrious lineage of failures. #Voynich manuscript decoded 2020 cracked#Earlier this September, scholar Nicholas Gibbs published an article in the Times Literary Supplement claiming to have cracked the code, only to be pooh-poohed by medievalists across the internet. The text that came to be known as the Voynich manuscript is now housed at Yale, and dozens of medievalists and cryptologists study it every year. To this date, no one has successfully solved either problem. “Two problems presented themselves - the text must be unravelled and the history of the manuscript must be traced.” “The fact that this was a 13th century manuscript in cipher convinced me that it must be a work of exceptional importance, and to my knowledge the existence of a manuscript of such an early date written entirely in cipher was unknown,” Voynich said. It wasn’t in any known shorthand or variation of medieval Latin or English or French or any other known language. And not a word of the script was comprehensible. It was long - 234 pages - filled with pictures of plants and naked women and what appeared to be astrological diagrams, and line after line of script. It wasn’t gilded or beautifully illuminated, like the manuscripts with which it was bundled, but it caught his eye nonetheless: It was in code. In 1912, an antiques dealer named Wilfrid Voynich came across a remarkable manuscript. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |